Inherent Powers

Inherent powers are Presidential powers derived or inferred from specific powers in the U.S. Constitution. Contrasted with Article 1, section 1 of the Constitution which states "herein granted," the statement in Article 2, section 1 ("shall be vested") has led to the development of the theory that President has inherent powers.In re Debs, 158 U.S. 564 (1895)[1], was a United States Supreme Court decision handed down concerning Eugene V. Debs and labor unions. Debs, president of the American Railroad Union, was involved in the Pullman Strike earlier in 1894 and challenged the federal injunction ordering the strikers back to work. The injunction had been issued because of the hindering of transportation of U.S. Mail. However, Debs refused to end the strike and was subsequently cited for contempt of court; he appealed the decision to the courts. The main question being debated was whether the President had a right to issue the injunction, which dealt with both interstate and intrastate commerce and shipping on rail cars. Interestingly, the legislative branch never delegated to the President the power to issue injunction. However, with an opinion written by Justice David Josiah Brewer, the court ruled in an unanimous decision in favor of the U.S. government. Joined by Chief Justice Melville Fuller and Associate Justices Stephen Johnson Field, John Marshall Harlan, Horace Gray, Henry Billings Brown, George Shiras, Jr., Howell Edmunds Jackson, and Edward Douglass White, the court ruled that the government had a right to regulate interstate commerce and ensure the operations of the Postal Service, along with a responsibility to "ensure the general welfare of the public.
See more at Wikipedia.org...

'Inherent powers' are defined in Black's Law Dictionary as 'powers over and beyond those explicitly granted in the Constitution or reasonably to be implied from express grants[.]' Black's Law Dictionary 782 (6th ed. 1990).

A district court possesses inherent power over the administration of its business. It has inherent authority to regulate the conduct of attorneys who appear before it, Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43 (1991), to promulgate and enforce rules for the management of litigation, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 146 (1985), to punish contempt, Young v. United States, 481 U.S. 787, 793 (1987), and to remand cases involving pendent claims. Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 357 (1988). A federal court's inherent authority to manage its docket and maintain proper decorum does not authorize it to carve out exceptions to remedies expressly provided by Congress.